US GOVERNMENT USING SPY SATELLITES TO SP

Msg # 1992 of 2000 on RelayNet Legal issues chat
To: ALL, From: "NEWSTOBEREAD" Time: Wednesday, 8-15-7, 2:59
[ List Messages | List Conferences | Previous Message | Next Message ]
--- UseNet To RIME Gateway @ 8/15/07 2:59:14 PM ---

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118714764716998275.
html?mod=hps_us_whats_news

U.S. to Expand
Domestic Use
Of Spy Satellites
By ROBERT BLOCK
August 15, 2007; Page A1


The U.S.'s top intelligence official has greatly expanded the range of
federal and local authorities who can get access to information from the
nation's vast network of spy satellites in the U.S.

The decision, made three months ago by Director of National Intelligence
Michael McConnell, places for the first time some of the U.S.'s most
powerful intelligence-gathering tools at the disposal of domestic security
officials. The move was authorized in a May 25 memo sent to Homeland
Security Secretary Michael Chertoff asking his department to facilitate
access to the spy network on behalf of civilian agencies and law
enforcement.

Until now, only a handful of federal civilian agencies, such as the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration and the U.S. Geological Survey, have
had access to the most basic spy-satellite imagery, and only for the purpose
of scientific and environmental study.

According to officials, one of the department's first objectives will be to
use the network to enhance border security, determine how best to secure
critical infrastructure and help emergency responders after natural
disasters. Sometime next year, officials will examine how the satellites can
aid federal and local law-enforcement agencies, covering both criminal and
civil law. The department is still working on determining how it will engage
law enforcement officials and what kind of support it will give them.

Access to the high-tech surveillance tools would, for the first time, allow
Homeland Security and law-enforcement officials to see real-time,
high-resolution images and data, which would allow them, for example, to
identify smuggler staging areas, a gang safehouse, or possibly even a
building being used by would-be terrorists to manufacture chemical weapons.

Overseas -- the traditional realm of spy satellites -- the system was used
to monitor tank movements during the Cold War. Today, it's used to monitor
suspected terrorist hideouts, smuggling routes for weapons in Iraq, nuclear
tests and the movement of nuclear materials, as well as to make detailed
maps for U.S. soldiers on the ground in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Plans to provide DHS with significantly expanded access have been on the
drawing board for over two years. The idea was first talked about as a
possibility by the Central Intelligence Agency after 9/11 as a way to help
better secure the country. "It is an idea whose time has arrived," says
Charles Allen, the DHS's chief intelligence officer, who will be in charge
of the new program. DHS officials say the program has been granted a budget
by Congress and has the approval of the relevant committees in both
chambers.

Wiretap Legislation

Coming on the back of legislation that upgraded the administration's ability
to wiretap terrorist suspects without warrants, the development is likely to
heat up debate about the balance between civil liberties and national
security.

Access to the satellite surveillance will be controlled by a new Homeland
Security branch -- the National Applications Office -- which will be up and
running in October. Homeland Security officials say the new office will
build on the efforts of its predecessor, the Civil Applications Committee.
Under the direction of the Geological Survey, the Civil Applications
Committee vets requests from civilian agencies wanting spy data for
environmental or scientific study. The Geological Survey has been one of the
biggest domestic users of spy-satellite information, to make topographic
maps.

Unlike electronic eavesdropping, which is subject to legislative and some
judicial control, this use of spy satellites is largely uncharted territory.
Although the courts have permitted warrantless aerial searches of private
property by law-enforcement aircraft, there are no cases involving the use
of satellite technology.

In recent years, some military experts have questioned whether domestic use
of such satellites would violate the Posse Comitatus Act. The act bars the
military from engaging in law-enforcement activity inside the U.S., and the
satellites were predominantly built for and owned by the Defense Department.

According to Pentagon officials, the government has in the past been able to
supply information from spy satellites to federal law-enforcement agencies,
but that was done on a case-by-case basis and only with special permission
from the president.

Even the architects of the current move are unclear about the legal
boundaries. A 2005 study commissioned by the U.S. intelligence community,
which recommended granting access to the spy satellites for Homeland
Security, noted: "There is little if any policy, guidance or procedures
regarding the collection, exploitation and dissemination of domestic
MASINT." MASINT stands for Measurement and Signatures Intelligence, a
particular kind of information collected by spy satellites which would for
the first time become available to civilian agencies.

According to defense experts, MASINT uses radar, lasers, infrared,
electromagnetic data and other technologies to see through cloud cover,
forest canopies and even concrete to create images or gather data.

Tracking Weapons

The spy satellites are considered by military experts to be more penetrating
than civilian ones: They not only take color, as well as black-and-white
photos, but can also use different parts of the light spectrum to track
human activities, including, for example, traces left by chemical weapons or
heat generated by people in a building.

Mr. Allen, the DHS intelligence chief, said the satellites have the ability
to take a "multidimensional" look at ports and critical infrastructure from
space to identify vulnerabilities. "There are certain technical abilities
that will assist on land borders...to try to identify areas where
narcotraficantes or alien smugglers may be moving dangerous people or
materials," he said.

The full capabilities of these systems are unknown outside the intelligence
community, because they are among the most closely held secrets in
government.

Some civil-liberties activists worry that without proper oversight, only
those inside the National Application Office will know what is being
monitored from space.

"You are talking about enormous power," said Gregory Nojeim, senior counsel
and director of the Project on Freedom, Security and Technology for the
Center for Democracy and Technology, a nonprofit group advocating privacy
rights in the digital age. "Not only is the surveillance they are
contemplating intrusive and omnipresent, it's also invisible. And that's
what makes this so dangerous."

Mr. Allen, the DHS intelligence chief, says the department is cognizant of
the civil-rights and privacy concerns, which is why he plans to take time
before providing law-enforcement agencies with access to the data. He says
DHS will have a team of lawyers to review requests for access or use of the
systems.

"This all has to be vetted through a legal process," he says. "We have to
get this right because we don't want civil-rights and civil-liberties
advocates to have concerns that this is being misused in ways which were not
intended."

DHS's Mr. Allen says that while he can't talk about the program's
capabilities in detail, there is a tendency to overestimate its powers. For
instance, satellites in orbit are constantly moving and can't settle over an
area for long periods of time. The platforms also don't show people in
detail. "Contrary to what some people believe you cannot see if somebody
needs a haircut from space," he says.

James Devine, a senior adviser to the director of the Geological Survey, who
is chairman of the committee now overseeing satellite-access requests, said
traditional users of the spy-satellite data in the scientific community are
concerned that their needs will be marginalized in favor of security
concerns. Mr. Devine said DHS has promised him that won't be the case, and
also has promised to include a geological official on a new interagency
executive oversight committee that will monitor the activities of the
National Applications Office.

Mr. Devine says officials who vetted requests for the scientific community
also are worried about the civil-liberties implications when DHS takes over
the program. "We took very seriously our mission and made sure that there
was no chance of inappropriate usage of the material," Mr. Devine says. He
says he hopes oversight of the new DHS program will be "rigorous," but that
he doesn't know what would happen in cases of complaints about misuse.

--Andy Pasztor contributed to this article.

Write to Robert Block at bobby.block@wsj.com

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 100
 * Origin: RelayNet  MoonDog BBS Brooklyn, NY (900:100/50)
300/5647
 

[ List Messages | List Conferences | Previous Message | Next Message ]
Search this conference for:

2018 The Trashcan BBS - http://bbs.thenet.gen.nz. All rights reserved.